Wednesday, 20 August 2025
Understanding the Academic Row Over ‘Temperature Neutrality’ vs ‘Climate Neutrality’ Ireland’s climate policy is currently the subject of intense academic debate following a controversial shift in how the Government’s key advisory body, the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC), defines the country’s 2050 climate goal. The dispute centres on the Council’s decision to interpret ‘climate neutrality’ […]
Ireland’s climate policy is currently the subject of intense academic debate following a controversial shift in how the Government’s key advisory body, the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC), defines the country’s 2050 climate goal. The dispute centres on the Council’s decision to interpret ‘climate neutrality’ as ‘temperature neutrality’, a move that critics argue could reduce ambition on greenhouse gas (GHG) cuts, particularly from agriculture.
This disagreement goes beyond semantics. It has significant implications for how Ireland’s carbon budgets are set, how emissions are reduced across sectors, and whether the country is contributing fairly to global efforts to limit climate change.
So what is the difference between these two terms?
Under traditional interpretations aligned with net zero, ‘climate neutrality’ means reducing all greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible, with any remaining emissions balanced by removals, such as carbon sequestration in forests or technological capture. This approach considers the total volume of emissions and requires substantial structural changes across sectors, especially agriculture, land use, and energy.
The Climate Change Advisory Council, in its proposal for Ireland’s 2031–2035 carbon budget, adopted a new approach. It defined climate neutrality not in terms of total emissions, but in terms of ‘temperature neutrality’, a state in which Ireland causes no additional warming of the Earth’s atmosphere by 2050.
This definition puts the focus on global temperature impact rather than on the quantity of emissions. The Council justified its decision by referencing the Paris Agreement’s temperature goals (keeping global warming well below 2°C, and ideally below 1.5°C), and by considering Ireland’s unique emissions profile, which is heavily weighted toward methane from agriculture.
Ireland’s agricultural sector is unusual in a global context. It produces nine times more beef and dairy than the country consumes, leading to a disproportionately high share of methane in Ireland’s GHG emissions. Methane is a short-lived but potent greenhouse gas: it traps heat much more efficiently than carbon dioxide but breaks down in the atmosphere within about a decade.
Because methane’s warming effect is relatively short-lived, cutting methane emissions—even modestly—can have a strong impact on temperature over a short timeframe. This makes temperature neutrality an appealing target for countries like Ireland and New Zealand with similar agricultural profiles.
However, critics argue that this approach offers too much ‘wriggle room’. Under the CCAC’s proposal, Ireland could emit an additional nine million tonnes of greenhouse gases between 2031 and 2035 compared to a traditional net-zero trajectory. The Council stated that it’s up to the Government to decide which sectors benefit from this flexibility.
A group of prominent Irish and international scientists has strongly criticized this shift. In a paper published in Environmental Research Letters, researchers including Dr. Colm Duffy and David Styles (University of Galway), Dr. Róisín Moriarty and Prof. Hannah Daly (University College Cork), and Malte Meinshausen and Carl Doedens (University of Melbourne) argue that the Council’s definition:
Lowers the ambition for emissions reductions overall.
Protects Ireland’s methane-heavy agriculture sector, giving it a competitive edge.
Risks locking in global food system inequalities, since higher-emitting wealthy nations can maintain emissions while poorer nations face stricter reductions.
Undermines global equity and fairness, potentially leading to a failure to meet the Paris Agreement goals if other countries follow suit.
These scientists insist that net zero, not temperature neutrality, is the appropriate interpretation of ‘climate neutrality’ under both Irish law and international agreements.
The shift to temperature neutrality may seem minor or technical, but it has major policy consequences:
It could delay deeper emissions cuts in non-agricultural sectors such as transport, energy, or buildings.
If other countries were to adopt similar interpretations, the cumulative result could jeopardize the global 1.5°C goal.
It may reduce public pressure on agriculture and land use—sectors where emissions are difficult but essential to reduce.
The CCAC has acknowledged these risks. In its carbon budget proposal, it noted that Ireland’s approach only works if the rest of the world sticks to more conventional emissions pathways that are Paris-aligned. Otherwise, global targets could be missed.
Ireland’s adoption of temperature neutrality over net zero climate neutrality has opened a deep rift within the climate science and policy community. While the Climate Change Advisory Council believes the shift is justified by Ireland’s emissions profile and international obligations, critics see it as a dangerous precedent that undermines global climate equity and weakens national ambition.
As Ireland finalizes its climate pathway to 2050, the core question remains: Should climate goals prioritize the global temperature outcome or the volume and fairness of emissions cuts across all sectors?
In a world facing escalating climate impacts, the answer could shape not only Ireland’s future, but that of the global effort to avoid catastrophic warming.
At All-Ireland Sustainability, we’re committed to building a greener, fairer island, together. Stay informed on the latest environmental initiatives, community action, and policy developments shaping sustainability across Ireland, North and South.
👉 Sign up for our newsletter today and be the first to hear about upcoming events, expert insights, and ways to get involved.
Whether you’re a seasoned advocate or just starting your journey, new members are always welcome.
Subscribe now and be part of the All-Ireland Sustainability network.